8/28/2023 0 Comments Ac3 vs eac3Even AC3->PCM offers no benefit, only bloat.Ģ) If your source is MP2 (your case), or DTS, don't re-encode, but you must have a secondary stream otherwise most players will give you problems. And anything else must be re-encoded to a compliant format to be accepted.ġ) If your source is AC3 there is no reason to re-encode. The other two, MP2 or DTS, have "conditions". A good compromise for small file size, and near-equivalent quality to PCM, is AC3 at 256kbps IMO.Īlso both, AC3 and PCM, are the two "no-trouble" formats in NTSC-land (which I assume you're from) and require no conditions other than space. But, assuming the same source, the higher the bitrate for AC3, the closer to the quality of the PCM version. ![]() ![]() Is there any true "sacrifice" in creating DVDs with PCM audio as opposed to AC3, in regards to playback and longevity? PCM is lossless while AC3 isn't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |